results.
The optical test results included the polarisation performance, the irradiance profile and the transmitted wavefront error. Overall, the optical performance was excellent; the LPS behaved as expected. The impact of temperature was minimal, even in transient conditions. The dependency on angular configuration was minimal and the small effect observed in the coma term was as expected.
polarisation performance
The polarisation performance of the system is determined mostly by the coatings, and by mechanical stresses in the optical components - either inherent to the bulk glass material or induced by the mounting. To verify performance, a polarimeter was installed on a X/Y motorised stage attached to the OTA output (Figure 14) and a grid of measurement points was scanned.
The polarisation extinction ratio at the worst-case combination of orientation and temperature was found to be 98.6%, which easily exceeded the > 82% requirement.
irradiance profile
The 22W laser produces a Gaussian beam shape. The associated beam-intensity profile at the exit of the OTA, the second beam expander, was measured with a power meter installed on the X/Y motorised stage at the O'TA output. A fine grid of measurement points was scanned (Figure 15). The intensity profile closely matched the expected shape. Total throughput was determined by a Gaussian fit through the measured values. Integration yielded a throughput of 98.9%, which was significantly better than the > 97% requirement.
wavefront error
The wavefront error (WFE) was measured using a piece of optical test tooling designed around a Phasics high-resolution wavefront sensor. With this WFE tool installed directly between the laser head and the first optical element of the BCDS, and with the large reference flat installed on the OTA exit, the WFF of the whole LPS was measured in double-pass. The reference flat was fine-adjusted prior to wavefront measurements (Figure 16).
The wavefront measurement was analysed and its Zernike coefficients were determined, for example coma, astigmatism, trefoil and focus (Figure 17). The slight coma at lower elevations was expected because of the flexure of the system. The resulting wavefront errors were all approximately half of the available budget, which is an excellent result given all the environmental conditions encountered.